Update API documentation to reflect new nested `config` object structure in LLM model configurations endpoints. The response format now encapsulates provider-specific fields (provider, base_url, model, temperature, api_key, max_tokens) within a `config` object, while moving ownership metadata (user_id, group_id, is_default, version, created_at, updated_at) to the top level. This aligns the user-facing endpoints with the group configuration structure and improves API consistency.
- Add note clarifying that GET endpoints for groups return the same structure as user endpoints
- Document LLMModelConfigListResponse schema with default configuration selection logic
- Add comprehensive example for GET group configurations endpoint
- Update endpoint numbering to accommodate new group endpoints
- Ensure consistency between user and group API documentation
- Add `model_type` field to database schema with supported values (text, vision, stt, tts, multimodal, embedding, reranking, other)
- Add `name` field as table-level column for indexing and filtering
- Add reserved JSONB fields for future extensibility
- Update API request/response schemas to include `model_type` and `name` fields
- Add new `LLMModelConfigWithSource` schema for detailed configuration responses
- Update usage examples to reflect new required fields
- Improve database constraints and indexing documentation
- Include `version` field in all LLM model config response schemas
- Add `expected_version` parameter to update endpoints for optimistic locking
- Handle concurrent modification errors with HTTP 409 Conflict status
- Update both user and group config endpoints consistently
- Introduce new API route `/access` for managing LLM model configurations
- Add LLMModelConfig model to database models
- Include comprehensive schemas for LLM model config CRUD operations
- Register new router with tags for LLM Model Configurations
- Add optional `tags` query parameter to `/nodes` and `/templates` endpoints
- Support filtering by tags in format "key:value" with multiple tags ANDed together
- Example: `?tags=vendor:cisco&tags=model:7200` filters nodes/templates with both tags
- Maintain backward compatibility for existing API usage without tags parameter
Add three new optional fields to the template schema:
- vendor: Device vendor (e.g., Cisco, Juniper, Huawei)
- model: Device model (e.g., ISR4451-X, MX204, NE40E)
- netmiko_device_type: Netmiko device type for automation (e.g., cisco_ios, juniper_junos, huawei)
These fields enable AI/LLM integration to determine the appropriate
Netmiko device type when automating network device configuration.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>